Wolfspeed Power Applications Forum

Wolfspeed Technical Community:

switching losses C3M0021120K MOSFET

Options
christianA
christianA Contributor Level 1
edited January 2024 in Discrete Products

Hi Wolfspeed Team,

I would like to contact you because I used the "speedfit design simulator" tool to simulate the losses for the SIC C3M0021120K in a "classic BOOST" application. I obtained very satisfactory losses and in conjunction with the PSIM software. So, it's perfect. However, I have a question regarding switching losses. In a real application, by how much I can increase the switching losses compared to the simulation. I know that this takes into account a lot of parameters such as the quality of the board routing. but if I could have an approximation in % compared to your feedback, that would help me. In advance, thanks you

Comments

  • Forum_Moderator
    Forum_Moderator Wolfspeed Employee - Contributor Level 5
    Options

    Thank you for your post, it has been approved and we will respond as soon as possible.

  • Urvi_Ahluwalia
    Urvi_Ahluwalia Wolfspeed Employee - Contributor Level 2
    Options

    Hi christianA,

    You are correct, in a real system the switching losses will depend on parameters like the quality of board layout, parasitics and other system specifications. I don't have a recommendation for any switching loss scaling factor as it depends highly on such factors.

    SpeedFit is great at comparing different devices and topologies. However, it only evaluates the semiconductor losses in an ideal circuit - based on loss data from datasheets. Please refer to the following post for more information about SpeedFit: https://forum.wolfspeed.com/discussion/132/faq-sf-1-introduction-to-speedfit#latest .

    Thanks,

    Urvi

  • TBhatia
    TBhatia Wolfspeed Admin - Contributor Level 5
    Options

    Hi, I hope that this answered your question. I will close this discussion for now but if you have a follow up question, please "Start a New Discussion" and we would be glad to support you further.

This discussion has been closed.